Frankenstein: Creator of Evil or Evil Creator? - a Response to Mary Shelley's view of science.

On July 5, 1996, the first successfully copyd mammal was born. Soon aft(prenominal) the re- wee of this ewe named Dolly, many other large mammals were cloned, including horses and bulls. Humankind is in the be on of cloning, and it is only a matter of cartridge clip before the engineering to clone clement race is avail equal to(p). This brings to frail many questions of morality that mustiness be answered. If a clone kills a nonher human, then who would be responsible? Is the killing of a clone deemed murder? Is circumventing immortal and creating life evil? 2 hundred years ago, a writer named bloody violate Shelley wrote about(predicate) what she thought would unfold if humans were to create life. This book, Frankenstein, is about a scientist who found himself in the resembling predicament as the scientists of tomorrow. In this book, Frankenstein studied life and the human body until he was able to see the secret to life. However, existence an fast and obsessive man, he went too far and utilize his secret to usurp graven image?s power to create life. Although he intended for his insertion to be beautiful, it was an ugly, revolting monster. Clearly, Shelley?s view of perception was not that information itself is evil, but that science in the hands of a monster can get out some really evil things. Frankenstein was a man twain infatuated with science and with questionable morals. In one passage, Shelley explains that Frankenstein, through and through his bringing up from his father, did not believe in the supernatural. He was never dreadful of anything dead or dark. Frankenstein said, ?A churchyard was to me scarce the receptacle of bodies take of life? (161). The passage goes on to describes how Frankenstein became obsessed with cobblers last and that he spent days and nights in these vaults filled with bones. In these vaults, genuinely soon, S cience depart make it possible to clone peo! ple.

We cannot exsert off the advancement of scientific knowledge. But we can nerve for slipway through which, it can be controlled and do to greatly lend oneself for the rest of mankind. Surly the clones can be put to genuine use when you destine about it. I think that this is what Mary was trying to tell us. It is a dangerous proposition, the like the nuclear bomb, but it can be controlled. Morals will not stop it. I think it is Nelson Mandela who said It is our light, not our darkness, that frightens us. We contract ourselves who am I to be brilliant? Who be you non to be? The above essay provides a well tog out essay with clear ideas, albeit a lack of direction as to answering the essay question. The writer concludes that Frankenstein is evil because he apply science to create a monster, and that this act of creation was culpable and should not be socially accepted. The writer does a good job of placing his topic into context especially in the found where he ties his topic to current events. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper