Does meeting ones obligations to others serve ones self-interest? The logical answer as presented in many philosophers and humanists views is NO. Hobbes considers the challenge of a Foole, who claims that it is blind to honor an agreement made with another who has already win his part of the agreement. Noting that in this situation one has gained all the upbeat of the others compliance, the Foole contends that it would now be best for him to break the agreement, thereby conciliate himself the costs of compliance. Of course, if the Fooles analysis of the situation is correct, then(prenominal) would the other guild to the agreement not anticipate the Fooles response to agreements honored, and act thusly? David Hume (1711-1776) seemed to pose this same question in the so-called Farmers absorb: Two neighboring farmers each expect a bumper apparel of gamboge. separately leave behind require his neighbors divine service in harvesting his gamboge when it decease ons , or else a substantial contribution will degeneracy in the field. Since their corn will ripen at opposite clocks, the two farmers can ensure just harvests for themselves by lot each other when their crops ripen, and both kip down this. Yet the farmers do not help each other.
For the farmer whose corn ripens later(farmer 2) reasons that if he were to help the other farmer (farmer 1), then when his own corn ripens farmer 1 would be in the position of Hobbes Foole, having already benefited from his help: farmer 1 would no longer support anything to gain from him, so he would not help him, stinting himself the hard labor of a bit harvest. Farmer 2 cann! ot expect farmer 1 to egest his aid when the time comes, thus farmer 2 will not help the other when his corn ripens. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â This was the... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment