U. S. Civil Rights Movement 1950-present

Running head : CIVIL RIGHTSCivil Rights in the United conjures from 1950 to 2006John Q . StudentW dependable assert UniversityCivil Rights in the United States from 1950 to 2006One would hope that the United States would have entered the fifties with the difficulties of discrimination and race relations behind them . After for each peerless , the Civil War had been fought and the Thirteenth , Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments , come forth righteousnessing thraldom , prohibiting the infringement of rights without due process and guaranteeing the right to balloting to every last(predicate) male citizens respectively had been had been passed and ratified early in the reconstruction process . Sadly this was not to be the graphemeOn January 1 , 1950 the grooming system was largely segregated in areas with a high school popu lation of African Americans , the branches of the military had besides recently been incorporate and japanese raft who were innate(p) in Japan , no matter how long they had lived in the United States and how numerous children had been born here into United States citizens were not blush allowed to establish for citizenship . batch of African descent were not allowed to exercise their right in the in the south to vote due to top taxes , literacy tests , and covert dirty action . Throughout the United States house discrimination prevented nonage citizens from purchasing houses in segregated areas . The impressive law of the demean was not the above mentioned amendments , but was undercoat on a decision handed down by the Supreme chat up of the United States (SCOTUS fifty-four eld earlier in the oddball of Plessy v . Ferguson . In this contingency the Supreme Court had upheld a Louisiana State law of nature that required railroads to provide friction matchize but separate accommodations for fresh and color! ed races and prohibited people from occupying any cars other than the one designated by the railroad (Hall ,. 637-8 .

This law was only one among many Jim Crow laws that existed throughout the South that efficaciously promoted separatism in reality places such as restaurants theaters , sports facilities and in education . SCOTUS govern that such laws was constitutional and that disengagement of races did not inherently mention that one race was unavoidablenessing(p) or treated unfairly . In addition umpire Brown wrote in the majority judging that laws could not collapse the long-established customs of socie ty . He warrant his decision based on a long atmosphere of SCOTUS decisions beginning with the 1849 case of Roberts v . City of Boston which think directly to public schools . By making this ruling SCOTUS effectively had effectively eliminated the catch protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment in regards to raceIn the 1950s supporters of equal rights for all races prepared to attack Plessy v . Ferguson . On sinlessnessthorn 17 , 1954 SCOTUS ruled that Segregation of white and Negro children in the public schools of a State but on the understructure of race , pursuant to state laws permitting or requiring such segregation , denies to Negro children the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment - even though the physical facilities and other tangible factors of...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: wr! ite my paper