'Different Views on Affirmative Action Essay\r'

'This composing will discuss the different views on optimistic do. I will go over some(prenominal) views of this issue, and will explain which side my personal views give-up the ghost on. I will also discuss the pros and cons of plausive follow ups, and the effects it has on the employ manpowert. â€Å"In its tumultuous 45-year history, affirmative work has been both p paint a pictured and pilloried as an answer to racial inequality. The â€Å"affirmative deed” was first introduced by chairman Kennedy in 1961 as a method of redressing inequality that had persisted in spite of civil rights constabularys and constitutional guarantees” (Brunner, 2008).\r\n assentient motion is a advanced gearly controversial constitution that is designed to help minorities gain access to jobs and give lessonss, etcetera that they normally would non be able to insert into. â€Å" plausive action generally means large preferential treatment to minorities in admission t o universities or employment in government and businesses. The policies were originally authentic to correct decades of discrimination and to give disadvantaged minorities a boost. The diversity of our current society as strange to that of 50 years ago seem to sign the programs have been a success.\r\nBut now, many pretend the policies be no longer needed and that they run for to more fusss than they solve” (Messerh, 2008). The benefits were very great for minorities at one time. There was a time when minorities and women face up an uphill battle for equality in the workplace and in education. The majority of people relyd that the weaken nonrecreational jobs should not only go to unobjectionable men; but that they were the better dependant toleratedidates. â€Å"Keep in mind that all people have more sh bed than different characteristics, and no group is biologically superior to an some other.\r\nNevertheless, racism, the belief that some racial groups are inh erently inferior to others, has been common and is used to resign discrimination and equality” (Lauer & Lauer, 2006, p. 225). This belief was spurred on by racism and sexism in the past. â€Å"Focusing in particular on education and jobs, affirmative action policies required that measures be taken to ensure that blacks and other minorities enjoyed the same opportunities for promotions, salary increases, career advancement, school admissions, scholarships, and pecuniary aid that had been the nearly xclusive province of innocences.\r\nFrom the outset, affirmative action was envisioned as a temporary resort that would end once there was a â€Å"level playing field” for all Americans” (Brunner, 2008). I signify that this policy was a good idea to bug out with. There were many people back in the 50’s who would go out of their mood to make sure that blacks were not able to raise above their â€Å"born into roles”. At the time, a law like this wa s needed very bad.\r\nIt was very primary(prenominal) at that time in our history to allow in every one of all races and sexes. I believe that we have now reached a time in our history, where inclusion is at an all time high nationwide. This brings us to the problems that affirmative action has caused in our society. The biggest problem is reverse discrimination. â€Å"Affirmative action leads to reverse discrimination. Affirmative action is designed to end discrimination and unsportsmanlike treatment of employees/students based on color, but it in effect does the opposite.\r\nWhites who work unexpresseder and/or more qualified can be passed over strictly because they are white. Contrary to many stereotypes, many minorities fall into the gist or upper class, and many whites live in poverty. Unfortunately, the way things are set up now, a poverty-stricken white student who uses discipline and hard work to become the best he can be can be passed over by a rich minority student w ho doesn’t put in much effort at all” (Messerh, 2008).\r\nMany people do not want to admit to this problem; however, affirmative action has created discrimination of the majority. If a person is a white male, they may actually be looked over for the plain fact that a university or company does not have enough minority employees. This is a anti-Semite(prenominal) practice in the process. â€Å"By the late 70’s, however flaws in the policy began to show up amid its good intentions. Reverse discrimination became an issue, epitomized by the famous Blakke case in 1978.\r\nAllan Blakke, a white male, had been rejected two years by a medical examination school that had accepted less qualified applicants †the school had a separate admissions policy for minorities and reserved 16 out of 100 places for minority students. The Supreme speak to outlawed inflexible quota systems in affirmative action programs, which in this case had below the beltly discriminated a gainst a white applicant. In the same ruling, however, the Court upheld the legality of affirmative action per se” (Brunner, 2008).\r\nI personally smelling like affirmative action has also confirm down the quality within the universities and in the workplace. â€Å"Affirmative action lowers standards of accountability needed to stab students or employees to coif better. If a minority student can arse around into Harvard with a 3. 2 grade-point average, why should she push herself to get a 4. 0? Although some students or employees are self-motivated, closely people need an extra push or incentive to do their best, by panorama lower standards for admission or hiring, we are minacious the level of accountability.\r\nWe should reward hard work, discipline and achievement, we shouldn’t reward a student simply because he or she is a certain race, nor punished because he or she isn’t” (Messerh, 2008). All positions regardless of what it is, is better fi lled by filling it with the best and most qualified applicant. The best tool against discrimination and unfair hiring practices, would be to make sure all of our lower, middle, and high schools are up to par in coif to create the best applicants overall.\r\n'