Natural Family Planning Essay

To begin this es ordain I go forth first explain what lifelike Family supplying is and I will then turn to take a look at the essay written by Joseph W. Koterski entitled Theological Reflections on infixed Family readiness. graphic Family Planning is the general title for the scientific, natural and moral methods of family planning that can help married couples entirely achieve or postp one and save(a) pregnancies. Methods of Natural Family Planning depend on the observation paid to the course occurring signs and symptoms of the fertile and infertile phases of a muliebritys menstrual cycle. The main idea behind Natural Family Planning is that no methods of artificial contraception ar used. Such methods of artificial contraception include drugs, devices or surgical procedures which are used to avoid pregnancy.The first question Koterski asks is Can the use of Natural Family Planning to avoid pregnancy be virtuously justi?ed? He then goes on to state that m any(prenominal) d iscussions come to the conclusion that Natural Family Planning is acceptable providing one does non abide a birth control device mentality. The generator agrees with this statement, however one finds themselves asking does the whole idea of Natural Family Planning not meet a somewhat hindrance mentality to it also? The denomination then puts across the idea that bring forthing up is good within marriage however if a couple do have a contraceptive mentality it should be for a moral reason such as spacing births a identification number for the good of the mothers health, or caring better for the sake of ones alert children, or for the good of the marriage in a time of great pressures of some sort If these scenarios do come into a couples lives who use Natural Family Planning they are still remaining open to having children at these times however they are just hoping they will not until these scenarios have sorted themselves out.It appears that throughout the article the wr iter continually relates back to the subject about having a contraceptive mentality. He says on a frequent basis that if the reason for a couple having a contraceptive mentality is morally for the rightfield reasons then it is okay while still using Natural Family Planning. Compared to using contraception where the act itself ismorally offensive whether the intentions are good or bad, there does not seem to be anything intrinsically objectionable to a couple deciding whether or not to have intercourse at a finicky time during the womans menstrual cycle. If the couple have a good knowledge of Natural family Planning and are trying to avoid having more children then nothing should change about their actions during intimate relations by from the time at which they have them and knowing when not to have intercourse. The creator seems to be saying there is nothing wrong with this approach, however many a person would say this is having a contraceptive mentality.The writer then pose s two questions aimed especially at those religious people who do not believe in intercourse unless between a couple for fruitful reasons1. Are we morally required to have all the children possible for us, givenour current understanding of the natural rhythms of stinkiness?2. Are we morally required to chorus line from intercourse when we knowas a couple that we are infertile?These questions open up instead a strong argument for those sceptical about the idea that intercourse should only(prenominal) be for procreative purposes. These would possibly argue that internal intercourse is also for unifying purposes between a couple and thereof this would prevent a couple from growing closer. John Murray also states that it is not the womans tarnish that she is naturally infertile therefore why should she have to abstain from intercourseIf you were naturally blind, you could not do anything further to draw yourself blind. So when a woman is naturally infertile and knows it she cann ot do anything to make her acts of sexual intercourse infertile due to her natural infertilityThe point is not that she may not do so she cannot do so.The facts and figures of the matter according to Jack Dominian are currently ninety-nine percent of sexual activity is knowingly and deliberately non-procreative. Dominian then continues on with his argumentstating the majority need only a few sexual acts to achieve their desired family size. It appears Dominion is saying therefore that contraceptive methods are the easiest way of controlling family size.The literature of Paul Quay S.J. Then continue on the essay. Quay mentions how estrus is a sign of fertility in the pistillate species of animals and the male species can pick up on this. Humans are various however and the only way for us to know is by knowing how to read the cycles of temperature and cervical fluid as signs of fertility and infertility. The article continues on to mention the whole symbolism around sexual intercou rse. When a couple have intercourse it is almost like a language between them that only they can understand. Koterski uses Quays argument to say that the physical union of intercourse symbolises the union of persons in marriage. The whole idea of nakedness between a couple having intercourse is to symbolize their openness and vulnerability to one another. The whole point of this argument appears to be this is the reason why only when married should one engage in intercourse. If relating back to Natural Family Planning and not having a contraceptive mentality Traditionally the reason given is that sex is linked to replica and that the fruit of this, children, need two parents to look after them and give them legitimacy and status.As we carry on through the document and take a look at the application of Quays understanding to Natural Family Planning we see how it states the Church should have as many children as possible. The task seems to be to bring all of these who are naturally bo rn to be reborn of the water and the Holy Spirit of the uterus of the church by baptism. The document continues on to focus more towards the Church and how even though one may be born to Christian parents this does not mean one is a Christian. It is only through water and the Holy Spirit that we can be brought from this world of sin into the Christian community and the Church. It is only through God however that these children should be brought into this world and not as items of property, therefore conception should be one hundred per cent natural and not through in vitro fertilisation or any such procedures.The authors final few points are quite valid when he states the the infertile period for a couple who are using the method of Natural Family Planning is a period for the womans body to rest before releasing the next ovum. Natural family planning should also allow the womans body to rest during the natural spacing of pregnancies. In this sense by abstaining from intercourse it i s an looking of love on the mans behalf as he is caring for his wife. The main point the author is trying to get across is that some of the time, even though intercourse is a way of expressing love, abstemiousness can sometimes be for the greater good of the family and the relationship.To conclude, this essay states what Natural Family Planning is and the many different aspects to it. As with everything it has its pros and cons however if practised properly it allows a couple to do as the Church teaches and make a decision about how many children to have in a wise and loving flair trying to bear in mind various needs, such as health, their existing children, societys needs, etc.13 The whole idea about making Natural Family Planning successful is not to have a contraceptive mentality. This however is a mentality that the majority have and as verbalise by Jack Dominion ninety-nine per cent of sexual activity is knowingly and deliberately non-procreative.BibliographyDominian, Jack , Masterbation and premarital Sexual Intercourse , God Sex and Love (London SCM Press, 1989),Koterski, Joseph W. Theological Reflections on Natural Family Planning, http//www.nvjournal.net/images/stories/SampleArticles/6.4.pdfMurray, John, Lecture notes.http//www.usccb.org/issues-and-action/marriage-and-family/natural-family-planning/what-is-nfp/