.

Thursday, March 21, 2019

Applying Common-sense Morality to Life :: essays research papers

Applying Common-Sense Morality to animatenessI believe that I could and do live with W. D. Rosss surmise of common-sense morality as my own moral code. I bear with many of the principles that Kant and Utilitarianism follow, but I believe they are too strict. I agree with the system of moral dilemmas and priorities that common-sense morality uses. It allows a mortal to prioritize moral provinces and choose which obligation is more important based on a particular plaza. I believe common-sense morality can easily be applied to military posts at crustal plate, at work, and at school.First, I will turn back an example of how common-sense morality can be applied to a situation at home. Lets say that my father and I do plans to meet for dinner on Thursday night. According to Ross, I confirm made a promise to meet him for dinner and this situation would take place under the obligation of fidelity. In class on Thursday, I fall out out that I have an exam in my business morals class on Friday and I know that I should stay home and study for it instead of going out to dinner. After thinking approximately the situation, even though my father and I had previous plans to go to dinner, I would decide to change our plans to a later date and study for the exam. By doing this, I broke my promise to go to dinner, but the exam is more important. According to Ross, I have prioritized the exam over the dinner in order to fulfill by obligation of self-improvement.Second, I will blow over an example of how common-sense morality can be applied to a situation at work. Lets say that I work at Wendys fast food restaurant. James, the manager of the store, and I are the precisely staff members in the store. All of the sudden, James accidentally spills hot crud all over his hand and is screaming for help. I immediately thresh over to help, but then a woman in the dine area screams to predict 911 because her husband is having a heart and soul attack. Now I have a moral dilemma. According to Ross, I have an obligation of beneficence to both people, but I need to evaluate which persons health is more at risk. In this situation, the person having the heart attack is in much more danger than James. I would call 911 and then tend to James.

No comments:

Post a Comment